Current:Home > NewsA second high court rules that Japan’s ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional -Infinite Edge Capital
A second high court rules that Japan’s ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional
View
Date:2025-04-27 16:43:26
TOKYO (AP) — A second Japanese high court ruled Wednesday that the government’s policy against same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, the latest in a series of decisions upholding plaintiffs’ demands for marriage equality.
The Tokyo High Court called the ongoing ban “a groundless legal discrimination based on sexual orientation,” saying it violates the constitutional guarantee of right to equality, as well as individuals’ dignity and equality between sexes. It was a clearer statement than the 2022 lower court decision that described the situation as “an unconstitutional state.”
The Sapporo High Court ruling in March said not allowing same-sex couples to marry and enjoy the same benefits as straight couples violates their fundamental right to equality and freedom of marriage. Wednesday’s ruling is the seventh overall that found the ongoing ban to be unconstitutional or nearly so, against only one district court decision that found it constitutional. The rulings can still be appealed to the Supreme Court.
In Wednesday’s ruling, Presiding Judge Sonoe Taniguchi also wrote that the purpose of marriage is not only to produce offspring but also to ensure stable legal status for the partners, and that there is no rational reason to justify excluding same-sex couples. She said there is a shared international consensus against discriminating based on sexual orientation.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said Wednesday’s ruling has not been finalized and that his government will continue to watch other pending court cases.
Still, the winning streak has raised hopes among the LGBTQ+ community.
Plaintiffs cheered outside of the court Wednesday, while their supporters held banners carrying messages such as “Further advance toward marriage equality!” and “No more waiting for legal revision!”
Makiko Terahara, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, welcomed the ruling, calling it historic. She and her fellow lawyers in a statement demanded the government immediately take steps “to open the door for marriage equality.”
“I felt grateful to be alive when I heard the word ‘unconstitutional’ from the judge,” said Yoko Ogawa, a plaintiff in her 60s. She said she worries about a lack of legal protection for her and her partner as they age, and that “I hope to see progress toward legalization as soon as possible.”
Their main obstacle, Japan’s conservative Liberal Democratic Party’s ruling coalition, lost a parliamentary majority in Sunday’s election and is likely to have to compromise on more liberal policies pushed by the opposition parties such as marriage equality, which is largely supported by the general public.
Japan is the only member of the Group of Seven industrialized countries that does not recognize same-sex marriage or provide any other form of legally binding protection for LGBTQ+ couples.
Six lawsuits on marriage equality have been filed at five regions across Japan since 2019. LGBTQ+ activists and their supporters have stepped up their efforts, and in 2023, the government adopted a law that is not legally binding that states discrimination is unacceptable.
Hundreds of municipalities have issued partnership certificates as a workaround for same-sex couples to lower their hurdles in renting apartments and facing other forms of discrimination, but it does not provide the same legal benefit as heterosexual couples, Wednesday’s ruling said.
The court, however, rejected a request by the seven plaintiffs that the government pay them 1 million yen (about $6,500) each in compensation for damages suffered under the current system that does not recognize them as legally married.
On Tuesday, the United Nations women’s rights committee in Geneva published a report that urged the Japanese government to amend civil code to allow an option of allowing married couples to retain separate surnames. It noted that the current law requiring only one surname compels virtually all women to adopt their husband’s surname, another issue also stalled by the LDP for decades.
The U.N. committee also urged Japan to revise the male-only succession rule under the Imperial House Law to allow a female emperor.
Hayashi called the report “regrettable” and “inappropriate.” He said the imperial succession is a matter of national foundation and that it is not part of constitutional basic rights.
___
Associated Press video journalist Ayaka McGill contributed to this report.
veryGood! (713)
Related
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Jimmer Fredette among familiar names selected for USA men’s Olympic 3x3 basketball team
- Struggling private Birmingham-Southern College in Alabama says it will close at end of May
- What we know about the condition of Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge and how this sort of collapse could happen
- Sam Taylor
- Fired Jaguars Jumbotron operator sentenced to 220 years for child sex abuse
- Lawsuit says Ohio’s gender-affirming care ban violates the state constitution
- Should college essays touch on race? Some feel the affirmative action ruling leaves them no choice
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- MLB power rankings: Which team is on top for Opening Day 2024?
Ranking
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Caitlin Clark effect: Iowa's NCAA Tournament win over West Virginia sets viewership record
- I've been fighting cancer for years. I know what's in store for Princess Kate.
- Travelers through Maine’s biggest airport can now fly to the moon. Or, at least, a chunk of it
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Former state senator Tom Campbell drops bid for North Dakota’s single U.S. House seat
- Hold Tight to These Twilight Cast Reunion Photos, Spider Monkey
- McDonald's to start selling Krispy Kreme donuts, with national rollout by 2026
Recommendation
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Named for Star Spangled Banner author, the Francis Scott Key Bridge was part of Baltimore’s identity
A giant ship. A power blackout. A scramble to stop traffic: How Baltimore bridge collapsed
Iowa attorney general not finished with audit that’s holding up contraception money for rape victims
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
Lego head mugshots add to California’s debate on policing and privacy
Georgia senators again push conservative aims for schools
Stock market today: Asian shares are mixed after Wall Street retreats from all-time highs